Prior judicial experience does not generally appear to correlate with judicial behavior. The party affiliation of the President who appointed the judge is also useful in predicting judicial attitudes. Studies have found some correlation between a judge’s political party affiliation and how the judge will decide a case that is ideologically divisive. Partisanship and Appointing President’s Party Affiliation In addition, recent studies have not generally found age to be a valuable factor in explaining judicial behavior. For example, a judge’s race or sex has not been shown to be an influential factor in explaining a judge’s decisions. Studies have shown that there is not a great deal of correlation between demographics or social background and the decisions made by judges. There have been a number of empirical studies examining whether social background or personal characteristics influence judicial decisions. These include demographics and social background, partisanship and the appointing President’s party affiliation, prior employment, potential for promotion, and judicial precedent. This article discusses some of the factors research has evaluated as affecting judicial decision-making. Political scientists have conducted research and studies to identify what factors influence a judge’s decision-making. An independent court system allows fair and impartial decisions in legal cases. Judicial independence permits judges to make rulings based on legal principles instead of politics or public opinion. The independence of the judiciary is a central principle of a democracy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |